Looks like this is not true. This article names the MPs & says “...the politicians in attendance would not want to be "grilled" by journalists.” i.e. would not want to be questioned, NOT would not want to be named.https://talkradio.co.uk/news/david-davies-threatened-police-action-holding-meetings-transgender-concerns-18101628380#qQW76774WJqORQzB.99 …
-
-
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
Mr Paddick. Can I ask you a question. If you are so keen on trans rights why did you allow a law to be passed that denies a transman from inheriting a peerage. While that law stands your stance of transpeople being the gender they id as is a lie. Thanks
1 reply 6 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @SevenFlamingo @NicholasHellen and
The Act Of Settlement 1701 or Succession to the Crown Act 2013? I wasn’t appointed to the House of Lords until after both pieces of legislation had been passed!
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
Yup. While the house a Lords refuses to recognise Transmen as men. You have no case. I, WE, will NOT recognise transwomen as women. The ball is in your court.. You have a fight on your hands. Toddle off now and go do some work.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SevenFlamingo @NicholasHellen and
This debate is descending into farce.
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
Yes. Things do tend to do that when people ask gaslighters and liers to back up their claims with actual real life actions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SevenFlamingo @NicholasHellen and
I still don’t know what law I was supposed to have “allowed to pass” that prevents trans men inheriting a peerage and a “lier” is a person or object that rests in a horizontal position. I can assure you I don’t tweet lying down! See what I mean about farce!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
You Sir, are lying face down with your head in the sand. Section 16 of the GRA 2004. Section 16 states: 'The fact that a person's gender has become the acquired gender under this Act (a) does not affect the descent of any peerage or dignity or title of honour.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SevenFlamingo @NicholasHellen and
Thanks for that. I didn’t get into the House of Lords until 2013 so I’ll just stick to my first answer. In 2004 I was a cop.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
Haha... I am still not in the House if Lords and was NEVER a cop..yet I know the law. So that's a pitiful excuse. So when you get your peers to allow transmen to inherit a peerage over their male brothers... Come and tell me about equality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, so I’m not in favour of equality because I failed to oppose a law 9 years before I entered Parliament, & because trans men cannot inherit hereditary titles shows I don’t believe in equality for trans people! I think we should start by changing the law for women, don’t you?
-
-
Replying to @brianpaddick @NicholasHellen and
Well if laws are crap your job is to challenge them regardless of how old they are? No? Be they 1 year or 100 years old. And have you made any effort to change the law for women? Anything? No. You are more concerned with insisting men ARE women. You are so transparent!!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.