The perfect answer to the issue itself seems to be introducing absolute primogeniture, with no sex distinction, for all peerages, as is done for the Crown? That would make the issue redundant?
-
-
-
Exactly my point
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't care if it annoys you. Tough! You hold a peerage and have a duty to listen to what the people say. While the house a Lords refuses to recognise Transmen as men. You have no case. I, WE, will NOT recognise transwomen as women. The ball is in your court..
-
What law are you talking about?
-
You appear to be talking with a sock puppet account. There has been a large proliferation of fake accounts this year following likely funding by American anti LGBT groups. This is not a real person.
-
Ah the old right wing funded myth
-
Better than the anti semitic Soros conspiracy your lot peddle. And with, you know evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They mean the GRA, it has an exception in it that stops someone changing sex and getting a peerage / inheritance under sexist rules that allow men to get preference. I believe it does allow trans women peers to be still considered "male" and get the benefit.
-
Whole thing should be scrapped as primogeniture is sexist and archaic. It's also not exactly a good argument for *not* reforming the GRA!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.