I've read this thread and I've come to the sad conclusion that he is not engaging on the issues at all. He claims to be listening, yet places the word of trans women over evidence from women. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see balance here.
This is it. One element of the whole range of complex arguments taken out of context to make me look unreasonable. The list of muted accounts grow by the day & its very sad.
-
-
The stickler for me is the idea of how ILLIBERAL self ID is. It forces everyone to believe that there is an indescribable nebulous feminine essence, of which men can be possessed, and all they need to do is say the magic words "I am a woman" and then they are transubstantated.
-
And that.... if they don't believe it, they are guilty of hate (and could be prosecuted by the state). It's the new apostasy. I'm all for people practicing whatever belief they see fit but it CANNOT over ride secular beliefs grounded in physical reality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.