If people are pushed towards starting the debate under the unproven and unprovable premise that “transwomenare women” then it is impossible for all of those who will be affected to debate without prejudice.
Maybe because politicians are not “caving in” but are carrying out a consultation, the people you’re talking about are not fringe lunatics and not all women (51%) agree on these issues.
-
-
Why does it matter if it is all women, most women or some women? The principles of safeguarding and appropriate impact assessments should remain independent of any polling or are you espousing simple utilitarianism - if so, how many women are you prepared to sacrifice Brian?
-
Enough. I don’t know whether the misinterpretation is deliberate or not but it is not possible to hold a reasonable debate on this platform so I’m not going to hold one.
-
I’m guessing that means all women are to be sacrificed then. Given his historic support of ‘sex-work’ we shouldn’t be entirely surprised.
#misogyny https://har0ld.org.uk/en/article/2017/1205117/a-rational-approach-to-harm-reduction …pic.twitter.com/yse3B2R2as
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In numerous BPC-compliant polls, respondents (both sexes) oppose self-ID by around 3:1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you think adult men can turn themselves into women by simply wishing it so, then you are a fringe lunatic. Whether women agree or not - eliminating their spaces is detrimental. And by the way, what does ‘women’ mean? By your definition all humans are potentially women.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.