They can correlate, the point is both of them can also diverge depending on the particular changing conditions. Also while the Dylos is better than the temtop, it’s not perfect itself.
-
-
Replying to @swamidigital @laurenmyrick and
FWIW, a friend shared this with me. A $100,000 mass spectrometry device measuring co2 at 700ppm vs the “cheap” temptop device that’s $100 measuring at 666ppm. The similar results and vast delta in price give me increased confidence in their ability to measure.pic.twitter.com/b3RKf3WFgj
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @brianp @swamidigital and
More so, this is not so much about Temtop or Dylos measurement device quality. It’s about safety. I have a new born child which has been my primary concern as babies and elderly are more susceptible to air quality due to wild fires.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brianp @swamidigital and
“Particulate matter is the principal pollutant of concern from wildfire smoke for the relatively short-term exposures (hours to weeks) often experienced by the public. “ https://www3.epa.gov/airnow/wildfire_may2016.pdf#page7 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianp @swamidigital and
If Molekule excels at removing gases, yet the primary concern is particulate matter should your recommendation not be that a Molekule is used in tandem with a HEPA system that are more efficient at removing particulate matter from the air?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @brianp @swamidigital and
Again i ask for the safety of my child, which has been my driving force of concern and research on this topic, as I’m a new parent trying to ensure their safety.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @brianp @laurenmyrick and
Molekule is very good at both. My 7 month old nephew in Marin is relying on Molekule as well to be safe from smoke, so I get where the concern comes from.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @swamidigital @brianp and
And my point is that toxic gases (including formaldehyde, NOx, other VOCs & hydrocarbons) outnumber particulate 3:1 as a product of wildfire smoke. So if particulate are a concern, these are more so. And luckily, we take care of both. I linked a ref for this in another thread.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @swamidigital @laurenmyrick and
The EPA guide on wild fire smoke contradicts your claims about what should be the greater concern. It clearly states particulate matter is the larger health issue. Gases are an issue, closer proximity to fire and at lower concentrations than particulate matter. Highlighted here:pic.twitter.com/kjNRqjvls4
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianp @swamidigital and
We will have to agree to disagree, but I share in others extreme frustration at your reluctance to even suggest a HEPA based product could assist in providing healthier environment during these times of mass air pollution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Especially, since many others have shared data driven proof of their results that show the vastly increased reduction in particulate matter. Again this is all about safety and for the most vocal people on this topic it’s due to young children 1-12 months old.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.