Brian KlaasПодлинная учетная запись

@brianklaas

Political scientist ; DPhil from Oxford. Author: “How to Rig an Election” & “The Despot's Apprentice.” Washington Post columnist. Speaking: Tuesday Agency.

London, England
Дата регистрации: май 2009 г.

Твиты

Вы внесли @brianklaas в черный список

Вы уверены, что хотите видеть эти твиты? Если вы просто просмотрите твиты, @brianklaas по-прежнему останется в черном списке.

  1. Закрепленный твит
    20 мар.

    Kremlin hacking. Cambridge Analytica. Ballot box stuffing. Assassinations. Gerrymandering. Vote Buying. Fake News. Repression. There are many choices of How to Rig an Election—we need to understand them to help save democracy. New book with :

    Отменить
  2. 2 часа назад

    TOGETHER, WE WILL PREVAIL is the tag line from the adapted Mussolini speech that Jim Halpert prepares for Dwight Schrute as he accepts his award as Northeastern Pennsylvania Salesman of the Year.

    Отменить
  3. 18 часов назад

    After 13 days of flat denials. If this is the new denial, why would anyone take this new excuse seriously?

    Отменить
  4. 18 часов назад

    Such deficits are indefensibly reckless with growth reasonably high and unemployment low. Funny how the “Tea Party” wing of the Republican party has no problem with such debt now that it’s not Obama in office...🤔

    Отменить
  5. 20 часов назад

    This is disgusting. It’s tacit endorsement of Putin’s recent poisonings on British soil of not just Russian nationals but also British nationals. It gives Putin a green light to murder people—and it’s a clear abandonment of America’s most powerful ally. Revolting.

    Отменить
  6. 23 часа назад

    “All I can do is report what he [the King of Saudi Arabia] told me.” What an absurd statement. The US government doesn’t rely on the official denials & lies of kings. Echoes of Trump taking Putin & Kim at face value before parroting the talking points of dictators & despots.

    Отменить
  7. 24 часа назад

    Trump providing cover for Saudi on the alleged murder of Khashoggi raises two disturbing questions: 1) Would the Saudis murder Khashoggi if Trump wasn’t beholden to them financially? 2) Would the Saudis murder Khashoggi if he wrote for Fox News rather than the Washington Post?

    Отменить
  8. 24 часа назад

    Authoritarian governments have always blatantly lied about their own abuses. The difference is that they previously couldn’t rely on the President of the United States being their apologist-in-chief who spreads their propaganda and lies for them. Now they can.

    Отменить
  9. 15 окт.

    Trump is doubling-down on something insidious that he did previously: highlighting that Khashoggi is not a US citizen. He’s been hinting that he shouldn’t care so much that they murdered a US resident/Washington Post columnist because he’s not a US citizen. Disgusting & dangerous

    Отменить
  10. 15 окт.

    Trump has now tweeted about crowds 280 times. For comparison: He’s tweeted about human rights 3x. And one of those three times was to make fun of John Kerry for caring about them.

    Отменить
  11. 15 окт.

    I’ll be on around 8:30 am ET / 7:30 am Central. Hope you can tune in!

    Отменить
  12. 15 окт.

    The president is explicitly saying that inflicting enormous amounts of lasting trauma on innocent toddlers and young children is a pretty good thing actually because it’s so horrific that it deters border crossings. Trump has shown us who he is; now it’s up to us to vote.

    Отменить
  13. 15 окт.

    The Saudis made a strategic calculation: Trump’s dictator worship; his personal financial ties to Saudi; and his hatred for the press—especially the Washington Post—meant he wouldn’t react harshly to them murdering a journalist. So far, they were right.

    Отменить
  14. ретвитнул(а)
    15 окт.

    Thought provoking from who sees the murder of journalists as symptom of deeper structural changes in the flow of money, power & information. Daphne & Khashoggi as canaries in the coal mine of globalised corruption..

    Показать эту ветку
    Отменить
  15. 15 окт.

    Basic science should not be partisan. Scientists have reached a clear consensus that climate change is real, dangerous, and caused by human activity. Again, a partisan “debate” in which one side is just objectively wrong based on empirical scientific evidence.

    Отменить
  16. 14 окт.

    The voter fraud/voter suppression debate is one of those frustrating “partisan” issues that we can answer with data. It’s not partisan to show that, empirically, voter suppression often influences the outcome of US elections; voter fraud does not. Facts shouldn’t be partisan.

    Показать эту ветку
    Отменить
  17. 14 окт.

    Democrats fear voter suppression. Republicans fear vote fraud. The data show suppression is widespread; voter fraud is not. George W. Bush’s DoJ studied voter fraud & found it occurs on 0.00000013% of ballots. A recent study found 31 cases out of a billion ballots from 2000-2014.

    Показать эту ветку
    Отменить
  18. 14 окт.

    Democrats should make expanding voting rights a cornerstone of the party’s agenda: turn Election Day into a national holiday; implement automatic voter registration (an opt-out rather than opt-in system); expand early voting; create strict guidelines about voting line wait times.

    Отменить
  19. 14 окт.
    Отменить
  20. 13 окт.
    Отменить
  21. 13 окт.

    Good to be (briefly) back in the USA! Looking forward to a packed 60 hours — an NFL game, a talk at NYU, , with and eating my three favorite American foods that don’t exist in the UK: Milanos, Wheat Thins, and Goldfish.

    Отменить

Загрузка может занять некоторое время.

Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.

    Вам также может понравиться

    ·