The women I met at the Women’s March in DC on that most incredible day in history include Mary Parker, who was born three years before women could vote. She told me to work harder and so I did.pic.twitter.com/QVktguQ4Y6
A woman got 3 million more votes than Trump in 2016. Women powered the resistance starting the day after Trump's inauguration. Women candidates won up and down the ballot in 2018. Democrats should not question whether a woman can win in 2020.
-
-
-
“Keep goin’ and keep workin’...”-Mary Parker, Women’s March Jan. 21, 2017, Washington, D.C.pic.twitter.com/NLxGNnN0EH
- 1 תשובה נוספת
שיחה חדשה -
-
-
I think its pundits and op-Ed writers questioning it, I don’t think democratic voters are questioning it, seeing as how it was democratic voters who voted for a woman in 2016.
-
It 100% is a media creation. I haven't heard a person in real life ask that question since Hillary essentially beat trump in 2016. If that scenario was played a thousand times, Hillary would've ended up our president 999 times. It was a fluke.
-
I’ve heard it a bunch. Like, some think Mayor Pete is more electable than Warren. “My conservative grandma heard him speak and loved him” for example.
-
It’s bc he is polling better than Liz. I’m no fan of Pete’s, but the media is talking less about the female candidates bc they are not currently polling well and that’s been the case for months.
-
But he came out of nowhere and no one knew who he was until like a month ago. The media gave him a lot of coverage, he did the CNN town hall and THEN his polling numbers started to rise.
- 1 תשובה נוספת
שיחה חדשה -
-
-
! My take: electability is just a form of political gaslighting:https://link.medium.com/wyNNvGiAbW -
" Just a form of gaslighting" doesn't make it ineffective. Consider HRC whose gender made her "unelectable" in the eyes of many voters.
-
Gaslighting is very effective and becomes less so by naming it.
סיום השיחה
שיחה חדשה -
-
-
The fact that the question could be raised and taken seriously (however briefly) shows how much erosion we’ve endured under this administration.
-
so very true. What seemed so very possible and within reach seems farther away than ever
-
A reminder - not that we were asking for one - of how fragile progress actually is. We can assume nothing and must defend every gain fiercely.
סיום השיחה
שיחה חדשה -
-
-
I 'LOVE' the image in your post so much Lady (Kristen Blush)!!! That was indeed, a "VERY FINE HISTORIC MOMENT" in 2016!!!...pic.twitter.com/jnMCmunoEu
-
Thank you!!!!! I love to share ithat photo specifically on Mother’s Day. Hillary and Chelsea are super moms.
-
You're so welcome Lady (Kristen Blush). I know that I can speak for all (Hillary Rodham Clinton-NY
Loyal Supporters), when saying that we most likely will "NEVER GET OVER (2016) BEING STOLEN" from all of us!!! Especially of course, (HRC-NY) & "DEMOCRACY ITSELF!!!".#Stolen2016
סיום השיחה
-
מסתבר כי הטעינה לוקחת זמן־מה.
ייתכן שיש עומס או תקלה זמנית בטוויטר. נסה שוב או בקר בדף המצב של טוויטר לקבלת מידע נוסף.