Not to ST anyone - this came up on my feed elsewhere - but: my Gentile friends. With the best will in the world: Circumcision does not cause catastrophic harm.
I will just say - I sent you an article providing objective evidence of the foreskin being the most touch-sensitive part of the penis. Instead of reading the article, you quickly googled a Wikipedia article, the source of whose claim you also did not read.
-
-
Because I don't trust you or your position, because "circumcision waaaarghble" is antisemitic.
-
Something like 99% of circumcisions in the United States are non-Jewish. That is rather self-absorbed to think that someone criticizing a practice overwhelmingly done by non-Jews is anti-semitic, without even considering the reasons for their criticism. Anyhow - take care
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To say "that's not an accurate statement" without reading the source of someone's claim they've just sent you, on the basis of a 30 second Wikipedia search smacks of motivated reasoning, not a charitable conversation. I don't have time for the former, but am open to the latter
-
I have no interest in discussing this with you. Did you miss that part? Let me make it absolutely clear. Go. Away.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.