Not to ST anyone - this came up on my feed elsewhere - but: my Gentile friends. With the best will in the world: Circumcision does not cause catastrophic harm.
It's the most touch sensitive skin on the penis; it seems reasonable that some men might be upset that was removed before they could say yes or no https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tre.531 …
-
-
This is not an accurate statement. "The highest quality evidence indicates that circumcision does not decrease the sensitivity of the penis, harm sexual function or reduce sexual satisfaction." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision …
-
I will just say - I sent you an article providing objective evidence of the foreskin being the most touch-sensitive part of the penis. Instead of reading the article, you quickly googled a Wikipedia article, the source of whose claim you also did not read.
-
Because I don't trust you or your position, because "circumcision waaaarghble" is antisemitic.
-
Something like 99% of circumcisions in the United States are non-Jewish. That is rather self-absorbed to think that someone criticizing a practice overwhelmingly done by non-Jews is anti-semitic, without even considering the reasons for their criticism. Anyhow - take care
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.