If your faith is important to you, and you choose to not raise your child in it, then you deny the child the opportunity to experience religion in a natural, loving, celebratory and non coercive manner. It would be unthinkable, in my tradition, Judaism 2/
-
-
Replying to @StopBDS_PSFC @MaajidNawaz
to raise a boy without circumcision & make him feel outside the community. Of course, you have to do what is right for you in your heart. Just as it is wrong to impose religion on someone, it is also wrong to shame someone for their beliefs or impose anti-religion. 3/3
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @StopBDS_PSFC @MaajidNawaz
How is removing a foreskin from a baby who can’t consent non-coercive?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @brigadam @MaajidNawaz
Babies don't consent to vaccinations. They don't consent to wearing diapers, or clothing for that matter. They don't consent to eating. You cannot make the case that circumcision is damaging or detrimental. So what is your point?
9 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StopBDS_PSFC @MaajidNawaz
I’m responding to your non-coercion claim, so your response should address that. You now appear to be claiming coercion is fine, and all equal, amazingly. All coercion isn’t equal. Some coercion of infants harms them, some helps them. Are you an anti-vaxerr too?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brigadam @MaajidNawaz
Roxanne, it seems to me there are 2 separate issues here. One has to do with parental responsibility/rights. And one has to do with whether circumcision (c.) is harmful. Let's look at the latter first. (I speak as the parent of 2 boys, now adults). 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, I know c. hurt momentarily. But so do vaccines. Diaper changes brought about more protest than the either of the former. There is no evidence of c. being statistically harmful or risky. I don't know the epidemiology of c. complications vs. infection in un-c. boys. 2/
8 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Here's evidence of c. being statistically harmful and risky: https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/complications/ … http://spuonline.org/abstracts/2018/P21.cgi …https://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_U.S._Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KhazWolf @StopBDS_PSFC and
The lost boys estimate has been called into question; I have a paper coming out suggesting a 4 times lower death rate, but still 1 in 500,000 deaths, which is not trivial.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @briandavidearp @StopBDS_PSFC and
I look forward to reading that. Can I ask, have you read / does your paper touch on this hypothesis? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27840622 It is very tempting to believe, in the absence of any better explanation I can think of, but I may well be missing something in my appraisal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's really hard to say what to make of that hypothesis -- it's really really speculative
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.