My baby’s rights trump my feelings - removing a child’s body parts without its consent due to *my* religious beliefs is a violation of my child’s religious freedom & an imposition of my own cultural values onto a defenceless baby. I endorse an age of consent for male circumcisionhttps://twitter.com/lbc/status/969976660446588933 …
-
-
Freedom of religion stops at another person's body; it is not an unfettered righthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-limits-of-exemptions-from-a-higher-power/2015/07/02/3a2485b0-20f5-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html?utm_term=.65641ff47011 …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Just because it's legal it doesn't mean it's right. Child labour used to be legal once upon a time. So was slavery.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So who decides the level of mutilation? You crazy people? Slicing or stabbing... Both inflicting unnecessary cosmetic mutilation. How is that invalid? I thought the issue was having the choice? Did babies choose to have ears pierced? Grow up clowns
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.