Unfortunately not. Although they nominally used the SIGN criteria for assigning levels of evidence (http://www.guiasalud.es/egpc/traduccion/ingles/parto_normal/completa/documentos/apartado00/levels_of_evidence.pdf …), they failed to employ a "carefully assembled multidisciplinary group" as the guidelines for proper use of the criteria require. As @JennBossio et al. note
-
-
P.S. When I say "small coterie" I mean this kind of thing (see screen shot) - from Retraction Watch https://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/22/journal-editor-resigns-over-firestorm-from-circumcision-article/ …pic.twitter.com/vjXEwZKA6v
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any chance you have a single-document write up of this excellent tweet string?
-
Nope that's it ... Someone can put it all together on a page somehow I think, but I'm spent!
-
I’ll do it and send you a copy for your records.
-
If you have the time, John, I would appreciate a copy by dm.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good thread but am intrigued by a line of thought I've had that is mostly joking: Is decreasing male sensitivity that bad in the context of sex as it can take longer for women to reach similar states? No idea but wonder if that has been studied
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.