If you can't see how the dog-humping paper is ridiculous, you're part of the problem.https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1056627434211213314 …
-
-
Replying to @ConceptualJames
I haven't read the dog-humping paper. But if you're saying that, unless I reach the same conclusion as the one you intended (if I do read it), I am part of the problem, that is not a very fruitful dialectical tactic. In fact, it means, "the paper is ridiculous" is unfalsifiable.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @briandavidearp @ConceptualJames
Our study sought to test whether we could get a journal to accept a paper which claimed it could detect human rape culture by watching dogs unwanted humping and then advocate ways to train men like dogs. It did. We do see a problem with that. We know others don't. Maybe you.
2 replies 4 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @briandavidearp
It's getting especially amusing to me to watch this thread play out (and Brian's retweets) knowing he hasn't really the faintest idea of what's actually in the dog-humping paper. If I were him, I'd shut up until I read it and its reviews, but hey.
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @ConceptualJames @HPluckrose
I don't understand the tendency to overstatement. I read the dog park paper when it first came out & received attention. I didn't scrutinize it at the time as it seemed a curiosity, but I did take in the main points. "[not] the faintest idea" is simply false.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @briandavidearp @HPluckrose
Your earlier tweet erroneously indicated you hadn't read it.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
I see now that one of my tweets left off the qualification - someone pointed this out to me. I was having a hard time keeping track of all the interweaving threads
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.