Yes, it's a different objection. Surely you see that? Methods to content. Of course, people can disagree on either or both but you gave no indication of disagreement with our assessment of the fields before, just how we went about doing it.
-
-
We've spent a lot of time talking to people who jumped from one objection to another and it makes for neverending and pointless conversations. There's an awful lot of resistance of the idea that it can be OK to critique these fields.I'm now wary of trying to talk to ppl who do it
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ConceptualJames
Well I can certainly understand that. I see that you’ve been bombarded with many scattered tweets that are very accusatory and defensive etc & I can empathize w how exhausting it must be to keep fending all that off.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I wrote initial thoughts some time ago & haven’t said anything more, haven’t harassed u all or spoken ill. Tried2 engage w u in positive way first time. Today James tweeted me out of blue w weird disingenuous-seeming questions, snide comments etc. I didn’t come at u for a debate
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @briandavidearp @ConceptualJames
We just thought we'd laid the mistaken belief that we were making comparative claims to rest so James queried your pinned tweet still saying it. I think. Was that it?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ConceptualJames
And I said right away that I just hadn’t gotten around to unpinning it. I hadn’t thought much about all this since then. I was just trying to take James’s questions as they came.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @briandavidearp @ConceptualJames
You don't have to unpin it. I'm sorry if you felt jumped on. We are just sick of being repeatedly misunderstood having tried so hard to be clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @briandavidearp
I don't think he needs to unpin it, but he should justify having pinned it and left it there. That's why I asked. I thought his take was bad and disappointing on the 3rd, and I was surprised to find he was so glad about it that he had pinned it.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Given I now find he's barely read what he criticized, I'm glad I asked.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Read stuff before you reach a conclusion? What is this, Russia?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
You seem to have misread what I wrote. I specifically said I was *not* willing to reach a conclusion about specifics concerning the dog park paper until I had carefully read it. My (explicitly tentative) conclusion concerned overall methodology.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.