It's getting especially amusing to me to watch this thread play out (and Brian's retweets) knowing he hasn't really the faintest idea of what's actually in the dog-humping paper. If I were him, I'd shut up until I read it and its reviews, but hey.
-
-
Assuming they haven't charitably assessed these fields given the just jaw-dropping amount of objective work (which was so rigorous, they were actually praised by many reviewers in the fields) they've put into studying them just doesn't seem super charitable to me.
-
What is so infuriating is that we did put so many hours into this every week for a year, especially James, and then spent more hours trying to explain it & putting everything out there and since then, we've been fielding constant quick, hot & uninformed takes on the significance
-
Tell ya what, I'll volunteer my time to write an insane grievance studies paper in Brian's name, with his permission and help, and we'll see how it goes. What do you say, Brian?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You will see I told Helen what I saw as fair in her responses & left initial conversation on friendly note. I haven’t said much abt this issue at all since then. Today I was prodded, out of nowhere, to clarify what of my original tweets I ‘stood by’. I tried my best to do so
-
I just thought calling out their alleged lack of charity was somewhat ironic in itself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.