It has become clear Brian's disagreement wasn't a simple misunderstanding of our claims as comparative and consequently in need of a control. Since clarifying that one, he's indicated an approval of Butler, an ambiguity on objective truth & the potential for approving our papers.
I don’t know what 2 say. I appreciate your writings on these topics. Something about the hoax struck me as being in bad faith. You don’t have to see value in anything, of course. I floated some thoughts weeks back & let it rest & said at time I admired your thinking generally
-
-
We misrepresented ourselves for the purpose of the project (which we don't think of as hoaxes but are getting resigned to that term now) but we have not strayed from our purpose in doing it which is consistent with what we've done straightforwardly and for years.
-
I don't want to be confrontational either and I appreciate your good opinion of my work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.