Our hoaxes provided good evidence of a problem. Our gained expertise in the field provided reason to believe it's a special problem. @HPluckrose
You're right that nutrition studies doesn't explicitly rely on constructivist identity claims (a rather big barrel: some constructivist identity claims are perfectly reasonable); but it does rely on statistical construction of (e.g.) cancer causation, which is probably far worse.
-
-
OK. I don't know about this but would people be allowed to look at that or what they have to somehow compare it to problems in gender studies as a control? Couldn't it just be a problem in its own right to be addressed as such?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.