Are you insisting that it's fairly easy for amateurs to get reputable medical journals to publish research that started with a preferred conclusion?
I agree that your project brought a lot of attention to some of the problems that exist in some fields. I am doubtful that you convinced many who didn't already agree with you, however, so while a lot of heat has been generated, I don't know if much light has
-
-
From the private communications I've been receiving, it's likely to be a setup for a backdraft. Something will come along eventually now, I suspect, break a window, flood the space with oxygen, and the whole thing will blow the eff up.
-
Okay but again I'm concerned about your approach to representativeness, base rates, and so on. Presumably, the private communication *you* are getting is not representative of the private communication *being sent* about your hoax
-
Time will tell. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.