A little mini-thread about the grievance studies hoax, responding to concerns from @ConceptualJames that the emphasis of my initial set of responses may have been in someway misplacedhttps://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1056611677251272706 …
-
-
... even how we use scales in, well, most of psychology that uses scales, is frequently no better than "quantitative alchemy" as these authors argue:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01973533.2016.1256288?journalCode=hbas20 …
-
I think your academic fragility is showing.
-
I'm not sure I follow what you mean by this. Is this an implied of argument of some kind? It's been really difficult for me to track the thread of what you are saying in some of these exchanges or what kind of response you are looking for, other than perhaps to be provocative
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I commend you for being deeply concerned about those problems, and I hope you can successfully help address them. I don't think you're really weighing the thing honestly here, though. Do you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.