I said at the end of the string that it was an initial offering, for the sake of more general discussion. So, in the original tweets I already indicated that I was saying something tentative and preliminary. If you have a particular concern I could try to speak to that
Here is the first sentence of the hoaxers' write up of their own work https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ …pic.twitter.com/GOFwkqlHyE
-
-
Yes, they're saying something is wrong in these fields. They aren't saying something isn't also wrong in other fields like, say, psychology, where the replication crisis continues to rage. Other fields are outside the scope of their thesis from what I gathered.
-
I'll cop to believing that no other field would have found remediating transphobia by shoving things up one's ass based upon poorly interpreted data from eight subjects to constitute compelling research or "a truly marvelous paper."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.