OK here is my take on the 'grievance studies hoax.' I think it shows that generally poorly reasoned, largely unfalsifiable papers with apparently absurd conclusions can get published in top journals in critical-studies-type fields. Fair enough. But it does NOT show a special ...https://twitter.com/AreoMagazine/status/1047292046073950208 …
I'm not sure how to interpret your question. I pinned the tweet a week ago or whenever it was people were mostly talking about this issue, and since then haven't thought to un-pin it. What is it you are suggesting or asking with your question?
-
-
It's amusing to me that it was pin-worthy; that's all. I think I'm flattered.
-
Some people were having a hard time following the thread or were getting cc'd into various sub-parts of it, so I thought it would be helpful to pin it at the top for the sake of convenience.
-
I found it confusing myself. Do you really stand by that still? I mean now that you've had some time to reflect.
-
By what particular thing are you asking about?
-
Your whole analysis. I could go point-by-point, but it's pretty shocking. Felt like a reaction to rather than consideration of.
-
I said at the end of the string that it was an initial offering, for the sake of more general discussion. So, in the original tweets I already indicated that I was saying something tentative and preliminary. If you have a particular concern I could try to speak to that
-
Do you think differently about the probe and what it shows now?
-
Since I gave about a dozen different thoughts in the string, it would really help me if you could ask a more specific question about some particular thing you want to know my current thinking about.
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.