Other problems will be in my not-quite-done-yet book on microaggression. I think Lilienfeld raises good methodological worries, then vastly over-inflates their importance.
-
-
-
So looking forward to your book!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It reminds me of a this cartoon. "But what if we all make an effort to be more respectful and mindful of others and it doesn't change anything" Do we really need hard numbers to be persuaded that taking other positions is a Good Thing?pic.twitter.com/qNunCdk2ln
-
If the proposed intervention is cost-free and has no negative consequences, intended or otherwise, then no. Free lunches dont even have to taste that good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure but it was odd seeing it back-to-back with this https://aeon.co/essays/what-duelling-can-teach-us-about-taking-offence … all seems very American somehow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2. "all contemporary definitions of aggression in the [psych] literatures propose... imply that the actions comprising this construct are intentional." <- not true. Lorenz initiated modern aggression research, on non-human animals, whose actions are not necessarily intentional
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. All of his claims about the dubious scientific status of the concept 'microaggression' apply equally to the concept 'consciousness', and yet there is a well-established science of consciousness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When big problems are well controlled, people obsess over tiny problems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.