... may be evidence of asymmetry in something like 'average' epistemological rigor. But there seems a relatively narrow ideological motivation to the authors' hoax in picking out critical studies for condemnation (without charitably engaging w/ what is good in its approaches)
-
-
But that's a really, really important question right? If they're setting out to 'throw a bomb', as you say, what compels them to include statements that their intent is pure? If it's the inverse, why tolerate and re-share mis-characterisations of their intent?
-
Yeah I think that's a really serious tension you're drawing attention to
-
(also good thread
)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.