You can only get those numbers hospital by hospital with FOI requests; ritual circ has no records. One hospital in Birmingham had 11 life threatening botches in 1 yearhttps://www.skeptic.org.uk/magazine/onlinearticles/infant-circumcision/ …
Replying to @briandavidearp @tomarama and
But to me it’s telling u seem not to include sheer nonconsensual loss of erogenous tissue from highly private part of body as a harm, only if there’s a “botch” are you willing to attribute harm? Imagine neonatal labaplasty for girls. Only harm if botched?
3:11 PM - 18 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.