She's even more retarded than Rupert Sheldrake is, with his morphic resonances. Protip: if you're quoting someone on science, try not to cite someone who thinks the treatise laying the mathematical framework of physics is actually an instruction book on how to rape women.
-
-
lol. Word salad. Bias: an inclination of temperament or outlook; prejudice in favor of or against one thing Perspective: a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something Both words have as a synonym viewpoint. You know, leaning, bent, attitude towards.
-
Well, things certainly got lively for a while.

-
When you talk to Leftists, psychologists or philosophers, you often run into people who pretend to be terminally obtuse by acting as though they, to whatever extent it's convenient, do not understand a single word of English. Yet know definitively that what you say is 100% wrong.
-
These people are liars and tedious ones at that. But these games are all they have; they are most assuredly incapable of prevailing with deploying all these nakedly dishonest tactics. And even with all that chicanery their success rate isn't particularly impressive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Harding's presumption is that scientific thought is biased because it's rooted in male ways of thinking, as opposed to a plurality of demographically-rooted ways of thinking. I claim that even if Harding were correct, the solution would be to eliminate the male ways of thinking,
-
rather than introducing female ways of thinking, so as to acquire the "view from nowhere" that she's so skeptical of. Of course, the problem as ever is that she's operating on a false pretense; science is *not* a male way of thinking, so she's offering a prescription to a problem
-
that doesn't even exist. The actual purpose of this isn't to improve the scientific activity, but to introduce an explicitly political element into the process, and allow otherwise unsubstantiated (albeit congenial to her politics) hypotheses to be on the same footing as
-
genuinely scientific ones. Creationists try to do the same thing when they demand that science "teaches the controversy," complaining that the Darwinian "bias" in biology ought to be offset by teaching "intelligent design" alongside it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Feminism is the hegemonic power system in universities. The claim that science is a social construct that benefits, uniquely, the people that belong to the race of its creators.. Is a baseless claim. Science is race, skin color, gender agnostic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.