How can they acknowledge babies can't consent without mentioning circumcision?! 


-
-
-
Ear piercing??
-
Yes. But ear piercing removes no tissue (let alone a sensory genital organ) and is largely reversible, so as a human rights violation it's smaller potatoes.
-
Yes true but can become infected
-
I'm not defending it.
-
No I didn’t think you were, I thought we were on similar mindset
-
I now realise we are. Ear piercing in the context of genital cutting is often a case of
#whataboutism, since "nobody in their right mind could possibly object to this very similar procedure".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will be countersignalling this unless boys are included and infant circumcision is banned. I will NOT be a patsy!!!
-
You won't have any cake unless there's icing and a cherry on top? It's still cake.
-
Intactivists letting themselves be used as a doormat hasn't, isn't, & won't get us anywhere. The anti-FGM law got us 20 years of gaslighting of gaslighting of "FGM IS WORSE!" Keep in mind that my "hostage demand" includes and IGM ban. But I won't let one pass without a circ ban.
-
To make anyone obey your demands, you have to have power. What is your "or else"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The doors open, you only have to push it
#circumcision@AtheistRepublic@Foregen@ExmuslimsOrgThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why was it even possible in the first place?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.