Bizarre question. (1) stating not all forms of FGM (as defined by WHO) are performed for same reason, which is true, does not entail or imply that any form should be allowed, and (2) I have written thousands of words arguing NO form should be allowed, eg: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285578712_In_defence_of_genital_autonomy_for_children …https://twitter.com/Steffen_Wasmund/status/1020057444825927680 …
-
-
Replying to @briandavidearp
The reasons (motivations) for FGM are irrelevant for the physical characteristic FGM. What does not belong in the "pot" FGM does not possess the physical characteristic FGM. If something does not possess the physical characteristic of FGM,...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Steffen_Wasmund
I have argued that the reasons are not the main moral issue but the physical breach of bodily integrity of a psycho sexually significant body part and the reasonableness of regarding oneself as harmed by this no matter how minimal the cuthttps://aeon.co/amp/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent …
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.