Interesting. The rejection letter for Granovetter's paper 'The Strength of Weak Ties', which has now been cited 48,958 times according to Google Scholar, but which was described as 'trivial' by one of the original reviewers. h/t @cocking_dean https://scatter.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/granovetter-rejection.pdf …
-
-
1/ https://quillette.com/2016/02/15/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/ … The Unbearable Asymmetry of Bullshit Published on February 15, 2016 "There are many ways to produce scientific bullshit. One way is to assert that something has been “proven,” “shown,” or “found” & then cite, in support of this assertion, a study that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ has actually been heavily critiqued (fairly and in good faith, let us say, although that is not always the case, as we soon shall see) without acknowledging any of the published criticisms of the study or otherwise grappling with its inherent limitations." Go w Wm. Davis:pic.twitter.com/BYX9XZi2hr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is not my thing (and I do not need it to be, since I have more balls in the air than I can currently juggle). But I would really be interested to learn and read more about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.