Paywall for the loss! I can only read the abstract but "competing interests, such as those that would be set back by the departure of religious citizens" sounds "curious" to me.
-
-
-
Yes he doesn’t justify that bit as well as he might have
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"The harms are not sufficiently serious to justify such a status" I don't see how one can assert this given the subjectivity of assessing harm and the variability of preferences across cases.
-
It’s because he’s using a technical notion of “expected harm” ... but I agree this poses a problem for his account and will write a response piece some time when I have energy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just an age-restriction to 18 years old, eh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.