Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @brentalfloss
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @brentalfloss
-
Prikvačeni tweet
I talk politics. I joke around. I talk Star Trek. I talk video games. I talk musical theatre. I swing wildly between tones, subjects and syntaxes; I'm trying to be less apologetic about it and just accept myself for the jumble that I am. Welcome to my Twitter feed.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
On that mute button today likepic.twitter.com/bZi9n7dRG6
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
(Samuel L Jackson meme) SAY “LET’S PUT IOWA BEHIND US AND MOVE ON” AGAIN
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Brent WANTS BERNIE TO WIN IN IOWA! proslijedio/la je Tweet
This was the whole point. Sit on the fake non-results and give Pete victory laps. MULTIPLE victory laps.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Ok now it’s “71% reporting” and a whole ‘nother news cycle of incomplete information that weirdly favors Pete. When it’s this close, the full picture is probably very different.pic.twitter.com/fA5MlZsTfD
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Now they’re just gaslighting is with the appearance of a Buttigieg win in Iowa. How long do you think it would take the average voter to see the “62% Precincts Reporting” part of this graphic?pic.twitter.com/kWds30kd3l
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Brent WANTS BERNIE TO WIN IN IOWA! proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Fishy fishy fishy.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
NBC’S CHUCK TODD JUST CALLED THIS A “DISAPPOINTING RESULT FOR THE SANDERS CAMPAIGN” BECAUSE THEY “DIDN’T WIN.” It’s only 62%!!! Then the motherfucker says this may well be the opening for Michael Bloomberg (!!!)
@NBCNews@MSNBC your bias is transparent and we’re not buying it.pic.twitter.com/3QRsulvo9H
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
62% means these numbers are about as useful as half a box of puzzle pieces. No Alex Jones conspiracies or anything but if the DNC WERE IN FACT trying to make it look like Mayor Pete won, this would be one way to attempt it...https://twitter.com/kenduffynews/status/1224816463636242433 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I just tuned into a live stream of the Iowa DNC press conference ... am I totally misunderstanding or did they once again postpone the results???? WTF???
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Brent WANTS BERNIE TO WIN IN IOWA! proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Brent WANTS BERNIE TO WIN IN IOWA! proslijedio/la je Tweet
BREAKING: Pete Buttigieg *was not* declaring that he won the IA caucus. When Pete claimed to be “victorious,” he was speaking figuratively. Watch as Pete refuses to actually say that he won, when he’s asked directly. “It’s clearly a victory *for us*...”pic.twitter.com/ChZ6E155zN
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Wuh-oh. Mayor Pete went and memed himself by declaring victory. Whether he and his camp hamfistedly peppered in parts of their victory contingency into their Caucus night messaging, or they were doing something more sinister and strategic, methinks this one may stick to him.pic.twitter.com/npUBfLh31H
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I’ll say this for Republicans: They produced their disappointing caucus results WAY more efficiently than the Dems havepic.twitter.com/L3xSRBn4an
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
You were probably looking at numbers for which only 2% of precincts were reporting. Bernie may have had the most votes so far, but with another 98% of precincts to go, results would have been extremely inconclusive at that pointhttps://twitter.com/robplayingames/status/1224670818111754240 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Cribbing from live reporting by the always-wise
@EmmaVigeland: Apparently all the folks in charge of Iowa precincts are using paper backups and not just the app. In other news YES I’M STILL AWAKE, MIND YOUR BEESWAXHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Imagine if the Super Bowl results took this long
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
But when will we learn?!?!? PAPER BALLOTS AND BORING TALLYING, FOR THE *LOVE*
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Let’s remember before we turn to conspiracy theories that there are many, many people involved in the Iowa Caucus who would leak it if actual shady shit were going down. Anyone who’s used a barcode e-ticket at a live event knows if the app crashes, everything grinds to a halt.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
