it's happening! :D
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Conversation
Why the move?
1
effect rows are more pain than they're worth
1
Will the alternative be monad transformers? Or does it seem most folks are going to be using the library version of effects?
Eff in PureScript is IO with a phantom type. You can't imitate transformer stacks with them. It's just a way of tracking which effects your projects use, there's nothing to inspect at runtime.
1
2
The equivalent of Haskell's Eff is purescript-run. (Just with a nicer API thanks to row types)
FWIW we'll probably continue to use Eff with rows at work, but the trade-offs for effect rows are bad at smaller scale
1
2
Show replies