Conversation

This Tweet is unavailable. Learn more

I tried writing some rust and got very frustrated that it didnt have >>= It was then that i realised, i am truly The Worst

`and_then` and the `?` operator gets you a decent way there. Or did you want those to be polymorphic? Because that is indeed a pain 😕

Replying to

`Result::and_then` is the same as `(>>=)`, `?` gets you most of do notation for Results. Ugly, clunky, and not in a TC, but they do the job.