Yehuda Katz@wycats·Jun 21, 2016Can someone give me the most charitable interpretation of this tweet? https://twitter.com/rob_pike/status/744950332120170497…This Tweet is unavailable.35728
Yehuda Katz@wycats·Jun 23, 2016After yesterday, I kind of want a regular "what is the most charitable interpretation of ___" tweet. :)Quote TweetYehuda Katz@wycats · Jun 21, 2016Can someone give me the most charitable interpretation of this tweet? https://twitter.com/rob_pike/status/744950332120170497…611
Dmitri@Rzhevsky·Jun 23, 2016honestly, the author had a fairly charitable interpretation:Quote TweetRob Pike@rob_pike · Jun 22, 2016Replying to @rob_pikeWhat I should have said: The more you know about the fundamentals of computing the more you will benefit. Learning should never stop.22
Brendan Zabarauskas@brendanzab·Jun 23, 2016I can understand the sentiment, but I certainly disagree with his ideas on what is 'fundamental'1
Dmitri@Rzhevsky·Jun 23, 2016you'd be shocked how poorly some psychiatrists understand physics, esp. cardiac fluid dynamics. Yet they're still real doctors.1
Brendan Zabarauskas@brendanzabReplying to @RzhevskyYeah, I agree with that too. I think it pays to have multiple perspectives, and to try to bridge between them in a respectful way.4:08 AM · Jun 23, 2016·Twitter Web Client1 Like