Conversation

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
I think you’ll find that most OCaml code that does anything performant has either unsafe (Obj.magic) or C underlying it somewhere. E.g., just at a quick glance, looks like Mirage libraries that claim to be pure OCaml use bigarray, which is C. Rust is trying to move that code in.
1
3
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Sorry, I didn’t see the ticket, but some people do care about the semantics. Theres a (maybe defunct) project “unsafe code guidelines” trying to give extensional behavior to safe rust types. Unsafe rust _can_ be given precise semantics, and different ones than C! Seems useful.
1
2
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more