Findings:
1) Far more people prefer inclusive than I would have thought. I guess this is thanks to Ruby/Perl?
2) It's still highly ambiguous and so probably shouldn't choose to use this syntax at all...
Conversation
How do folks feel about a..=b and a..<b for inclusive and exclusive respectively? :troll face: / serious question
7
2
Here's somebody who proposed this for Swift in 2014, heh:
1
1
Interestingly the comments mention that Pascal originally used `..` for inclusive ranges: wiki.freepascal.org/Subranges