Conversation

every time i discuss this with someone who’s closer to being a mathematician than me, they get really upset that i’m trying to take their single-letter variables away or something. but it’s like, it seems fucked up that the Normals can read and write but can’t parse your notation
17
100
yeah i think this matters for standard notation but i do maintain that for complex math stuff you really need concise, speed-readable notation and "math in papers should be legible to laypeople", which is an opinion i see often, is not tenable
2
13
oh, sure, but i'm saying this in the context of people saying "why isn't the notation just X" in the context of papers and those ideas are not workable i'm not denying the existence of a positive-sum solution, i'm denying that one *must* exist or that it is in any way obvious
2
7
my one ray of hope on this topic is that computer-formalization communities like Lean mathlib are pulling in regular mathematicians and convincing them to formalize all mathematics in an unambiguous programming language with an explicit naming convention style guide
2
2