Conversation

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Jules Jacobs
@JulesJacobs5
The accessibility criticism I've heard was against making research deliberately inaccessible, or not trying hard enough to make it accessible when it's the kind of research that should be accessible. That is, it's about presentation not content.
1
4
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Jules Jacobs
@JulesJacobs5
Deliberately inaccessible is perhaps not the right phrase. Making the research sound more fancy, with the side effect of making it less accessible. The opposite of down-to-earth. To be clear, I'm not talking about your research.
3
6
Brendan Zabarauskas
@brendanzab
Yeah, this tends to be what I mean by the term. As a consumer of research, I do appreciate when people try to make research only as fancy as it needs to be, but I realise that's not always possible when ideas are first being conceived, and could sometimes be counter-productive.
1
2