Conversation

Like I think generally it's considered good to have nice categorical models of your type systems, and alterations like this might break a bunch of that stuff? Or at least be a rather ad-hoc extension? All the category theory stuff is a bit mysterious to me though. 😰
1
yeah, I can usually make *some* headway on a sequent calculus judgement, but once the category theory’s out I might as well just drink
2
2
Heh, don't know much about the sequent calculus - have only really messed around with natural deduction. Takes a long time to get my head around the judgements though - especially if they aren't presented in a syntax-directed style.
1
has attempted to explain it to me in the past - something to do with in natural deduction you can make your proof tree get larger as you attempt to get to the leaves? So it's harder to know if you are going to finish or not? I might have got that wrong though. 😬
1
Show replies