Conversation

Yeah I remember now seeing your tweet about it! Was contemplating asking if you'd got any further on it!
Quote Tweet
So the nightmare with "dependent string diagrams" is that the *topology* of a diagram can depend on values in it. I think the idea is that each possible topology goes in its own slice This often happens in game theory, when the structure of the game depends on earlier choices
Show this thread
1
1
I'm cool with deferring the harder CT stuff to more experienced people - I'm more interested in experimenting with silly programming language implementations based on this kind of thing (but perhaps that's premature? 😅).
1
3
Since then I started playing around with branching string diagrams for game theory, running mostly with my gut feeling. I think these are like sigma types. When I try to figure out what I'm actually doing here, my brain melts for 2 whole different reasons
Quote Tweet
The neo-EX form of the extended market entry game from example 9.C.2 of Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green Now I'm cooking with plutonium!
Show this thread
Image
1
1
Coooool! You're right not to focus too much on the specifics of my diagram, because my category (of open games) is weird. In particular my forwards and backwards arrows don't behave symmetrically
1
1
This is funky. I have no clue whether you could make this precise or not, I can believe both possibilities
1
2