unpopular opinion: -> was a good operator that rust should have kept from C++
Conversation
which solves the (*foo).bar() awkwardness, but still leaves (&foo).bar(), which in C++ is solved by having transparent references...
1
yeah... no reason foo->bar couldn't just be foo*.bar
except that e.g. foo*(x) is ambiguous :/
for some reason postfix ref seemed less appealing but I don't remember why
1
the wiggly road through memory adresses