ᵉᵈᵈʸᵇ@eddyb_r·Mar 3, 2019apologies for rx/tx, even though it was an improvement over the previous name covention (not that I can remember what they used to be, just that they were ambiguous) :P12
ᵉᵈᵈʸᵇ@eddyb_r·Mar 3, 2019riiiiight! thanks :D frankly, rx: Receiver is fine tx: Sender is the problem here and I almost wish we made it tx: Transmitter31
Brendan Zabarauskas@brendanzab·Mar 3, 2019Feel like I might have been one of those advocating for Sender/Receiver early on - for that I’m sorry!21
crow emoji@glaebhoerl·Mar 3, 2019I think Sender/Receiver are *excellent* names -- it's just the global-rename oughta've caught the other conventions11
Brendan Zabarauskas@brendanzabReplying to @eddyb_r @glaebhoerl and 2 othersHave a feeling tx/rx was slightly after, because folks were annoyed with writing out the names in full.9:34 AM · Mar 3, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
ᵉᵈᵈʸᵇ@eddyb_r·Mar 3, 2019Replying to @brendanzab @glaebhoerl and 2 othershmm, that could be it, yeah, I'm not 100% on the timeline. which is one git blame away btw!