The Rich Hickey talk gets way better if you frame it as closed vs. open world instead of static vs. dynamic.
Conversation
Yeah, very little of it seems to actually be about static vs dynamic. It's mostly just a quick way for him to set up what he';s actually interested in talking about, which is closed vs open
1
3
Yeah, it's a valid gripe! Just mixed in with a lot of conflations with other unrelated things that aren't inherent to static typing. And then because the Clojure community seems to worship him as all-knowing it rubs off on them as well. 😫
1
I thought I'd give the talk a watch at the start of the thread but now you've reminded me why I threw my hands up and left the Clojure community. 😞
1
4
Yeah... it was okay, but you do have to peer through all the excess guck to see that. I don't have much time for gurus and cults of personality these days - feels extremely misleading and damaging, even if there is some truth in the message.
3
1
I did appreciate that he made the effort to say that he looks up his etymologies before the presentation rather than knowing them off by heart. But old habits die hard, and the guru-game was still in full force. ☹️