Conversation

Specifically, she makes a strong case that consistent code pronunciation could benefit new programmers because vocalisation and subvocalisation are important parts of comprehension.
4
10
I haven't self-reflected enough to give a reliable answer, but I think I might subvocalise code or maths I'm stuck on sometimes, with grunts and gaps for things I don't pronounce.
2
7
I don't even read it unless it's a word and my brain makes me, otherwise it's just a shape, like looking a map or something.
1
4
yeah, that's .... that's part of why i like single-letter variables in haskell sometimes, sometimes the feeling of "reading" feels like a hindrance -- not always tho, and i'm interested to reflect more on where and when that's the case
2
4
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it, having only one view of source code sucks and has caused untold disagreement and animosity.
2
10
My dream is one write only syntax and several (even library/ dsl specific) fully graphical interactive read only views.
2
6