Yup, that's correct!
Conversation
Dang, it's been 11 years. You'd think by now it'd just be default
1
1
Yeah. I really love the approach of 'simple core' then 'let a thousand extensions bloom', but they've waited long enough to turn on some of them by default...
2
Extensions have to be in the compiler itself too, right? I can't just write a package that adds a new one?
1
Right. But they are 'firewalled' off from the core language, which is very simple.
1
I could actually be wrong though- I feel like I gave seen third-party extensions that you can add with a pragma. They might be more limited though.
1
Here's an example! github.com/ocharles/what- - just seems to be a syntax thingo though, not actually extending the typechecker. But I guess the overloaded strings thing is just a syntax thingo anyway (just wraps literals in calls to `fromString`).
1
So basically Rust extensions (but looks like run closet to when lints are)
1
Nah, I think this is more run after parsing and before type checking. Possibly before/after desugaring.
1
That Readme claims it has access to the type checker and can know if any expression has an instance of show
1
Oooooh, serves me right for not reading closely. And helps to read the documentation: downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/us ๐

