Björn Brembs

@brembs

Professor of Neurogenetics

Regensburg
brembs.net
Registrerte seg juni 2009
547 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @brembs

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@brembs.

  1. Festet tweet
    22. jun. 2015

    For the record: since I got tenure in 2012, my non-tenured co-authors decide where we submit our manuscripts.

    1 svar 30 retweets 111 liker
  2. Retweetet
    for 5 timer siden
    Svar til og

    Other discussions of cost of publishing: and and

    1 svar 2 retweets 3 liker
  3. for 10 timer siden

    Yale historian warns Trump mirrors rise of fascism under Nazis in the 1930s

    2 retweets 1 liker
  4. for 11 timer siden

    “In effect, libraries have moved from MARC silos to Linked Data silos of incompatible data models.”

    3 liker
  5. for 11 timer siden

    Pflichtlektüre für diesen Monat: "Jenseits des Hamsterrads"

    2 retweets 1 liker
  6. for 12 timer siden

    “The proliferation of data models limits the reusability of bibliographic data.”

    1 svar 1 retweet 3 liker
  7. Retweetet
    for 15 timer siden

    "Heutzutage werden viele Univer­sitäten wie schlechte Kopien von Unternehmen betrieben." via

    1 svar 10 retweets 7 liker
  8. Retweetet
    16. jul.

    Jisc's latest survey would fail a first-year socSci exam. Unbelievably awful 1/n

    2 retweets 3 liker
  9. Retweetet
    16. jul.

    : » Even without retractions, ‘top’ journals publ...

    2 retweets 4 liker
  10. Retweetet
    16. jul.

    Pathetic: Salk uses lack of papers in vanity journals CNS to justify poor treatment of women faculty h/t

    17 svar 97 retweets 116 liker
  11. Retweetet
    14. jul.

    "Unidentified flying object", "unused frying oil", "unusual floral organs": who knew had so many meanings?

    , , og 3 andre
    6 retweets 3 liker
  12. Retweetet
    16. jul.

    This is a nightmare scenario but big props to these researchers for their scientific integrity.

    Huge respect for scientists who transparently disclose honest mistakes, thus preserving scientific credibility and commitment to truth
    1 retweet 3 liker
  13. Retweetet
    15. jul.

    Are the highest ranking scientific journals publishing the least reliable science?

    11 retweets 12 liker
  14. Retweetet
    15. jul.

    Even without retractions, ‘top’ journals publish the least reliable science |

    2 retweets
  15. Retweetet
    13. jul.

    The case against the journal article: The age of publisher authority is going, going, gone — and we’ll be just fine.

    52 retweets 54 liker
  16. Retweetet
    14. jul.

    OMG!!! Even without retractions, 'top' journals publish the least reliable science vía

    1 svar 6 retweets 6 liker
  17. Retweetet
    14. jul.

    Top journals publish the least reliable science vía

    9 retweets 5 liker
  18. Retweetet
    14. jul.
    Svar til

    and we have studies showing the favorability of results when funded by pharmaceutical co.'s

    1 retweet 1 liker
  19. 14. jul.

    Does the EU see virtual research environments as a staple of the European Open Science Cloud?

    3 retweets 3 liker
  20. 14. jul.

    Interesting reading wrt the aspect of funder influence/control over research data

    1 svar 1 liker
  21. Retweetet
    14. jul.

    "Publishing in the future will be a service, not a content-hoarding-and-extortion business"

    5 retweets 3 liker

@brembs har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·