Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @brembs

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @brembs

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    22. lip 2015.

    For the record: since I got tenure in 2012, my non-tenured co-authors decide where we submit our manuscripts.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    We started to invite peers to submit an review about our preprint "Assessing the size of the affordability problem in scholarly " by and me (via ). You may also post your review volontary at:

    Poništi
  3. prije 16 sati

    Just occurred to me: is someone in the tracking how much of the additional 350m £ the NHS will have gotten by Friday? If not, is someone at least tracking how much debt to the NHS the party in government is accumulating if they do not increase their budget by 350m?

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "Our project is illegal, but it’s the right thing to do in this crisis. We refuse to put copyright before human lives." People are using to freely but illicitly share more than 5,000 scientific articles on the

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. sij

    Dear Drosophila friends, we are interested in the molecular evolution of a gene in the montium species group and would appreciate any leads to get live or ethanol preserved samples of Drosophila parvula- we don't need a lot. Thanks much for RTing this

    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    “nationalism is a cancer that humanity may not survive. It is the root of racism. It thrives on separation when the world desperately needs to find its common humanity. ” well said,

    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    "Cross-species Analyses of Intra-species Behavioral Differences in Mammals and Fish" Something for ?

    Poništi
  8. 30. sij

    OMFG, every scientist's worst nightmare! And what an upright, honest and scholarly way to deal with it: "What to do when you don’t trust your data anymore"

    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    If you were a science nerd in the 1980s, this will be a blast from the past. Given how shockingly little of this fundamental research from that era has made it into school curricula, this is required watching for everyone who came later:

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    We are excited to announce that our supporting membership program has grown to five members. Please welcome with us new members , , & ! Find out why they joined us (incl. existing member ):

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    The argue that pre-prints on open platforms, not APCs are the solution for open science:

    Poništi
  12. 29. sij

    This look like a very interesting computational contribution to the nonlinear mechanism of the kind of spontaneous behavioral variability thought to underlie free will in humans: "Lévy walks emerging near a critical point"

    Poništi
  13. 28. sij

    Nice! Just over three years later SK (by and ) is discussing if one couldn't, perhaps, have publishers compete (i.e, bid, as in a tender) for the business of scholarly institutions: Better late than never :-)

    Poništi
  14. 28. sij

    Very useful overview. Will use it in teaching and circulate it to our faculty.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Brexit 2020: Absolutely everything you need to know about the nightmare ahead in one handy article

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 24. sij

    Because there was some recent discussion on the role and value of learned societies, here some useful rules of thumb on whether to keep or ditch your society: "Is My Learned Society Obsolete?"

    Poništi
  17. 23. sij

    Or, perhaps, we can hit two birds with the same stone and fix the pernicious incentives that contribute to the unreliability of our work, with an literature as an added side-benefit of implementing an infrastructure?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 23. sij

    Maybe we have to follow the data and change our mind: in this state, is an open literature more of a public health hazard than a life-saving opportunity? In particular with most of the literature accessible now: is now the time to re-assess our priorities?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 23. sij

    Here is their timeline as of December last year: 2013: announcement to test 50 'high-impact' works 2017: 2 of the first 5 replicate 2018: only 18 are technically replicable 2019: 14 of 18 have been done: - 5 success - 4 partial success - 2 not interpretable - 3 not reproducible

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 23. sij

    Like so many others, I used to believe that to the research literature would save lives: (from 2011) Now, with projects such as the Reproducibility Project Cancer Research, I'm not so sure any more:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 21. sij

    Very nice! this is what we need more from!

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·