-
-
En réponse à @realDylanAllman
I’d like to hear your argument on the other side. I believe collectives can be okay in some circumstances, but prioritizing them over individuals is wrong and the definition of collectivism.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @brandon_leleux
As long as the associations are voluntary, as long as no force is involved, it's libertarian. Collectivism VS. Individualism is entirely a preference. Either can be libertarian. Either can be antithetical to libertarianism. Apples and oranges.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @realDylanAllman
And the fundamental point of libertarianism is individual liberty. It’s always about the individual. I don’t agree that collectivism vs individualism is just a preference. Collectives can exist, but if the fundamental individualism isn’t there, then you don’t have libertarianism
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @brandon_leleux
Then you must not understand libertarianism fully. Maybe you do, but you're projecting your own preferences onto it.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
And I’m quite aware of the governing principles of libertarianism. Private property = you own yourself and have autonomy and everything is built off of that, including the NAP. The respect for individual sovereignty is key.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.