I’d like to hear your argument on the other side. I believe collectives can be okay in some circumstances, but prioritizing them over individuals is wrong and the definition of collectivism.
-
-
As long as the associations are voluntary, as long as no force is involved, it's libertarian. Collectivism VS. Individualism is entirely a preference. Either can be libertarian. Either can be antithetical to libertarianism. Apples and oranges.
-
I would argue that voluntary interactions are always coming from a place of individualism. Now libertarianism is an anomalous ideology. Many other ideologies can fit in it, but not other way. Collectives can exist in it, voluntarily, but collectivism is a contrary view.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I was just about to challenge
@HobbieReal on this, does left leaning imply collectivism? If so how does it get implemented on others without state force? -
I would venture to say that collectivism typically involves state intervention. Not always, but usually. Prioritizing a group’s “greater good” will inevitably harm or interfere with at least one individual.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.