He asked why the video was demonetized and you respond that his videos would be sexual or not family friendly. But the "responding to anti-gay commercials" video is neither sexual nor family unfriendly and still demonetized.
-
-
-
Replying to @bleemyoutube @captain_vlog and
It doesn't matter what you think about his videos. The question is why that video is demonetized.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bram_willems @bleemyoutube and
because the algorithm's whack. he also asked about the one with 'seducing' in the title, which, rightfully so was demonetized. it really ain't that deep.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @0wo_uWu @bleemyoutube and
I can understand the one about seducing if it would be the same case with similar videos from other creators. But there are actually LGBTQ creators suing youtube for demonetizing and hiding videos that are tagged with words as gay or bisexual. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bram_willems @bleemyoutube and
And these videos had 0% sexual content in it. And that is something that youtube needs to fix. So it could be the word seducing that demonetized his video, but it could also be the word gay.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bleemyoutube @captain_vlog and
Yes, it gets flagged automatically. But he said that the videos are reviewed. I'm just saying it's not obvious why his videos are demonetized and his question is valid.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Oh you're right.. I thought it was already reviewed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.