How about police themselves? Some of them should DEFINITELY have their firearms taken away.
D.C. council members have approved a bill for extreme-risk protective orders. Under the new legislation, police officers & family members can request a temporary removal of firearms from at risk individuals who may cause harm to themselves or others.https://wapo.st/2Bzx6zs
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great as long as at risk is always properly identified and people passing for safe are not sometimes in reality dangerous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is something I actually agree with, even though I believe it should be done on sworn testimony of an expert (police, doctor, etc.) with the judge mandated to consider both evidence for and against the defendant and . . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
. . . a chance for the defendant to face his accusers prior to the seizure. We already have a law like this in Maryland, and I fear it is already being abused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.